Build racing resilience before pressure arrives
Generated from
content/lms/racecraft-ii-champion-mindset/04-adversity-and-resilience/02-building-racing-resilience.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/racecraft-ii-champion-mindset/04-adversity-and-resilience/02-building-racing-resilience.md
Course: Racecraft II — Champion Mindset
Module: Turn setbacks into comebacks
Estimated duration: 55 minutes
Resilience is not a mood you hope to find after something goes wrong. It is a performance system you build before the bad session, the missed apex, the pressure from other people, the stalled plateau, or the race weekend that does not unfold the way you wanted. In this lesson, resilience means your ability to keep producing useful driving, useful decisions, and useful learning when your results dip. You are not trying to become emotionless. You are learning to keep your mind pointed at the work that improves the next lap, next session, and next event.
That distinction matters because racing is not just a physical skill. Bentley frames driving as inseparable from the brain: the body does nothing until the brain tells it to, and performance depends heavily on mental performance. The complete driver is more than someone who can drive one fast lap. Racing asks you to drive, learn, decide, adapt, communicate, handle pressure, and keep improving across good and bad days. If you only practice resilience after the bad day has arrived, you are asking an untrained system to work under load. If you build it beforehand, adversity becomes a trigger for your process instead of a reason to abandon it.
The principle is simple: prepare a response pattern for predictable trouble before trouble appears. The pattern has five parts. First, define the objective for the session or situation. Second, keep attention on performance and process rather than only the result. Third, use awareness-building questions to identify what is actually happening. Fourth, reduce effort when pressure rises so you do not force the wrong solution harder. Fifth, turn the experience into practice so the next version of you is better prepared.
This lesson sits beside recovery and strategy lessons, but it is not the same thing. Recover once, not twice is about the immediate aftermath of a mistake: how to keep one error from becoming two. Turn disadvantage into strategic advantage is about using an adverse race situation tactically. Here, you are building the mental and behavioral structure before the event. The goal is to arrive at the moment of pressure with a routine already installed.
Start with the mechanism. Performance varies. Even if you prepare well, there will be peaks and valleys in your driving. Some sessions feel clean and easy. Some feel blunt, busy, or disconnected. Bentley warns that expecting perfection is unrealistic and can reduce your chances of performing well. That is the core reason resilience must be built around process. If your self-control depends on every session meeting your expectation, you have no margin. One bad run group, one traffic-heavy qualifying session, one setup direction that feels wrong, or one confusing feedback note can push you out of useful work.
A resilient driver treats variation as normal data. That does not mean you accept sloppy driving. It means you stop interpreting every imperfect lap as evidence about your worth as a driver. You identify what the lap is telling you. Did you miss the objective? Did you choose the wrong objective? Did you apply more effort to a technique that was already wrong? Did you feed your mind the wrong target? Did you practice the habit you want to race with, or did you practice a habit you will have to unlearn later?
The first sub-skill is objective control. Before you can make a quality decision, you need to know the primary objective for the activity, and that objective can change with the situation. For an intermediate driver, this is one of the easiest places to lose resilience. You roll out for a session with a vague objective such as go faster. Then the first two laps are messy. Traffic ruins the clear laps. Someone passes you. Your lap timer shows a number you dislike. Because your objective was vague, your brain grabs whatever is loudest: defend pride, chase the car ahead, brake later everywhere, or try to rescue the whole session in one lap.
A resilient objective is narrower. It names the job you will do even if the session gets ugly. Examples that fit the corpus are process objectives such as improve awareness of what and how you are driving, practice the right skill, focus on performance, or make a better decision as the situation changes. You can still care about results. You can still want the lap time. But the lap time is not the steering wheel for your attention. The objective is.
Use a three-layer objective. The top layer is the event result you want, such as a cleaner race, a stronger qualifying run, or a faster session. The middle layer is the performance behavior that can produce that result, such as progressive turn-in in a high moment-of-inertia production car, smoother steering inputs, better sensory awareness, or a better decision under pressure. The bottom layer is the next-lap cue you can actually execute. If your top layer is faster laps and your middle layer is smoother inputs, the next-lap cue might be release effort through the hands before turn-in. If your top layer is a better race and the middle layer is decision quality, the next-lap cue might be identify the primary objective before attacking or defending.
The bottom layer is what saves you when adversity arrives. Results can be delayed. Traffic can hide the lap time. A setup issue can make the car slower than expected. Another driver can disrupt your rhythm. But the next-lap cue remains available. You can always ask what the job is now. You can always return attention to what you want to do, not what you are trying to avoid.
The second sub-skill is input control. Bentley summarizes mental performance with the idea that quality output depends on quality input. In resilience terms, your mind cannot produce calm, useful driving if you feed it a steady stream of threat, complaint, and vague frustration. Your inputs are not only what you see on track. They include your self-talk, your interpretation of data, the questions you ask after a session, and the way you let pressure from owners, sponsors, friends, family, or competitors enter the cockpit.
You do not need to pretend those pressures are not real. The corpus explicitly treats handling pressure from others as part of the driver job. The resilient move is to filter the pressure into usable input. A team owner wants results. A friend expects you to be quick. Your family wants the weekend to justify the cost. A sponsor expects professionalism. Those pressures can become noise if you carry them as fear. They become useful only when translated into a driving objective: prepare thoroughly, communicate clearly, execute the session plan, and review what happened without drama.
This is why awareness-building questions matter. A question points your attention. Ask a poor question and you get a poor target. Why am I so bad? gives your mind no useful driving task. Why is this car impossible? may hide the one thing you can adapt. Why did that driver ruin my lap? may be true emotionally but still leave you with no improvement. Better questions are concrete: What was my objective? What changed? What did I feel from the car? Where did I add effort? What one input would I repeat? What one input would I change? These questions match the corpus focus on awareness, understanding, performance strategies, and being aware of what and how you are doing.
The third sub-skill is effort control. Under pressure, many drivers try harder in a way that makes the car and the mind worse. Bentley warns that doing the wrong thing with more effort rarely produces a good performance. The stronger the pressure, the more the best drivers relax and let the trained skill happen. That is not passivity. It is efficient execution.
On track, excess effort often feels like urgency in the hands, a sharp breath held too long, a rushed turn-in, a late decision, or a need to fix the whole lap immediately. In the paddock, it feels like over-explaining, blaming the car before you have observed it, or changing three things at once because one thing went poorly. The resilient response is to downshift the effort before you choose the action. You are not slowing the car because you are scared. You are reducing mental and muscular noise so the skill you have practiced can surface.
Use the less effort rule in three places. Before going on track, sit still long enough to identify the session objective and one cue. In the car, notice the first sign that you are forcing: tight grip, rushed breathing, tunnel vision, or a desire to win back time immediately. After the session, resist the urge to make the story bigger than the evidence. The question is not whether the session felt good. The question is what the session taught you and what you will practice next.
The fourth sub-skill is practice programming. The corpus is direct that practice is programming and that you should practice the way you want to race. This is the heart of building resilience before you need it. You cannot expect a calm, useful response to adversity if all your practice reinforces panic, complaint, or over-driving whenever a lap goes wrong. Every session programs something. A cool-down lap after a mistake programs something. The first conversation after a frustrating run programs something. The way you review data programs something.
For an intermediate driver, this means resilience practice has to be inserted into normal event habits, not saved for crisis. You build it during clean sessions by setting objectives. You build it during imperfect sessions by staying with the objective or changing it deliberately. You build it in debrief by separating observation from judgment. You build it in the trailer or garage by replaying past successes so your mind has a familiar performance state to return to. You build it by focusing on what you want rather than what you do not want.
The fifth sub-skill is success recall. Bentley includes replaying successes and recalling the feelings of past successes in the mental skill list. This is not vanity. It is a way to give your mind a usable reference state. When a session goes badly, your brain can replay the failure so strongly that the next session starts inside the old mistake. Success recall gives you another reference. You are not pretending the problem did not happen. You are reminding your body and mind what good execution feels like so the next attempt starts from a useful template.
Make success recall specific. Do not merely tell yourself you have been fast before. Recall the feel of a good lap: the way your hands were lighter, the way your eyes were earlier, the way the car accepted the turn-in, the way your breath stayed low, the way the exit opened. Recall the paddock behavior after a strong session: you could explain what happened, you knew why it worked, and you knew what to repeat. This links directly to the corpus idea that a good driver should know why they won and why they lost.
That line is central to resilience. If you do not know why you performed well, success can make you fragile. You become attached to the result but cannot reproduce the process. If you do not know why you performed poorly, failure can make you fragile. You become attached to the disappointment but cannot extract the lesson. The resilient driver learns the cause in both directions.
Build your resilience notebook around causes, not moods. After each session, record the objective, the situation, the one thing that worked, the one thing that did not, the likely cause, and the next cue. Keep it short enough that you will actually use it. The point is not to write an essay. The point is to train your mind to look for performance causes while the emotional charge is still present.
Now connect this to car behavior. Resilience is not only about emotional pressure. Sometimes adversity is mechanical, dynamic, or adaptation-based. Bentley gives the example of a production car with a higher moment of inertia than an open-wheel car. Because more mass is distributed farther from the center, the car responds more slowly to initial turn-in. The driver may need to begin turn-in slightly earlier and make the steering more progressive. If you expected the car to react instantly, you might interpret the delay as personal failure, a bad setup, or a reason to over-slow the car. A resilient driver adapts the technique to the car.
That example shows why mental resilience has to include technical curiosity. You cannot separate the mind from the driving task. When the car does not do what you expected, your first job is not to defend your ego. Your first job is to understand the car. Does this platform need more progressive inputs? Is the delayed response a moment-of-inertia trait? Did you ask the front tires for too much too quickly? Did you slow the car too much because you lost trust? The resilient mind stays available to these questions.
The same is true across tracks. Every racetrack has its own personality, and adapting to each track plays a role in success. For this lesson, treat that as more than a track-learning note. It is a resilience requirement. If you carry one rigid expectation from track to track, car to car, or session to session, you create avoidable frustration. If your process expects adaptation, the new track or unfamiliar corner becomes a learning problem rather than a threat.
There is a danger here: resilience can be misread as stubbornness. It is not. Stubbornness says stay with the plan because changing means admitting weakness. Resilience says keep the purpose, update the method. If the session objective was clean brake release but rain arrives, you may keep the purpose of awareness and smoothness while changing the speed, timing, and risk. If the objective was qualifying pace but traffic makes clear laps impossible, you may shift to decision quality, spacing, or pressure control. The primary objective can change based on situation. That is not quitting. That is intelligent driving.
Another danger is confusing resilience with aggression. Bentley distinguishes assertive from aggressive in the mental skill list. Resilience is assertive because it stays active. You still choose, practice, adapt, ask questions, and pursue performance. It is not aggressive because it does not try to overpower the car, the session, or the facts. When you are aggressive with adversity, you often create the second problem: the missed apex after the first missed braking point, the desperate pass after a poor exit, the setup change made from frustration, or the self-talk that turns one session into a whole identity.
Use a simple reset chain when the first sign of adversity appears. Name the fact. Name the objective. Name the next cue. For example: The car is not rotating as early as I expected. The objective is progressive turn-in and awareness. The cue is earlier, smoother initial steering. Or: Traffic ended the flyer. The objective is decision quality. The cue is build space and execute the next clean sector. Or: I am gripping the wheel harder. The objective is less effort. The cue is breathe, soften hands, and drive the next reference point.
This chain is intentionally plain. Under pressure, complex systems fail first. You need a response that fits in one breath. It is also consistent with how mental programming works. You are feeding your mind what to do next, not what to fear next. You are focusing on what you want. You are practicing the right skill. You are asking a positive, awareness-building question.
Calibration matters. How do you know resilience is improving? Do not measure only by whether you feel calm. Calm is helpful, but racing is intense. A better measure is how quickly you return to useful work. At first, a bad session might consume the whole day. Then it consumes one conversation. Then it consumes one lap. Then it becomes a short note and a changed cue. That shrinking recovery window is a resilience gain.
A second calibration cue is decision clarity. When resilience is weak, every problem produces a cloud of possible reactions. You want to change the line, change the setup, prove something to another driver, and rewrite the whole plan at once. When resilience improves, you can state the objective and the next cue in simple language. You know what the session is for.
A third cue is physical effort. If pressure previously made your hands tight and your breathing shallow, improvement looks like noticing that earlier and softening before the mistake compounds. Bentley links great performance under intense competition with relaxing and using less effort. You should feel less need to force the car into compliance. You should sense more ability to let a trained skill operate.
A fourth cue is debrief quality. Weak resilience produces stories with little evidence: the car was terrible, the traffic ruined everything, I had no pace, the day was useless. Stronger resilience produces causes and next actions: the car had slower initial response than expected, I turned in too late and too abruptly, traffic changed the objective, the next session will focus on spacing and one progressive input. The emotional tone may still be disappointed, but the information is usable.
A fifth cue is practice consistency. You begin to use the same basic process on good and bad days. This matters because good days can also weaken resilience if you only chase the feeling. If a good result makes you skip the cause analysis, you are not building a repeatable driver. The corpus emphasizes knowing why you won and why you lost. Treat both as learning material.
For the next event, build a resilience plan before the first session. Write three predictable adversities and one response for each. Use adversities that actually happen at HPDE and club racing levels: traffic breaks the lap, the car feels different than expected, a mistake early in the session raises your urgency, pressure from people outside the car gets loud, or your lap time plateaus. For each, choose a response that controls attention. Traffic breaks the lap becomes reset spacing and execute the process corner. Car feels slow to rotate becomes earlier, more progressive input and observe. Mistake raises urgency becomes breathe, soften effort, one clean corner. External pressure becomes objective first, result second. Plateau becomes fresh approach and specific skill focus.
Then rehearse the plan mentally. Bentley treats mental imagery and programming as part of performance. You do not need to make this mystical. Sit before the event and picture one adverse moment clearly. Picture the emotional pull. Then picture the response: fact, objective, cue. If you cannot do the response in your mind, it is unlikely to appear cleanly at speed. If you can run the response in your mind, you have begun programming it.
Keep the rehearsal tied to driving. See the corner entry. Feel the wheel. Notice the breath. Hear the radio or the sound of another car nearby if that is part of the pressure. Then execute the cue. You are not rehearsing a heroic comeback. You are rehearsing the ordinary act of returning to good work.
During the event, use a two-minute pre-session routine. First, identify the primary objective. Second, identify the likely adversity. Third, identify the one cue you will use when it appears. Fourth, recall a past success that has the same feeling you want today: smooth hands, clear eyes, calm debrief, patient decision. Fifth, breathe and reduce unnecessary effort before you put the car in gear. This routine is short because it must survive the paddock.
After the session, use a two-minute debrief routine. First, record what happened without drama. Second, compare it with the objective. Third, identify what you fed your mind during the session. Fourth, name one cause. Fifth, choose the next cue. If the session went well, do the same routine. Resilience is built by consistency, not only by crisis management.
As an intermediate driver, you are likely past the stage where every lap is a mystery, but you are not past the stage where a bad session can hijack attention. That is normal. The lesson is not that you should never feel frustration. The lesson is that frustration gets a job. It tells you to return to the process.
The final rule is this: focus on performance and let results follow. Bentley states this as one of the inner speed secrets, and it fits resilience perfectly. Results matter, but they are downstream. Your direct controls are preparation, attention, effort, objective, sensory awareness, decision quality, and practice habits. Build those before pressure arrives, and adversity stops being a surprise test of character. It becomes another condition you have practiced driving through.
Worked example: the qualifying objective changes
Imagine you roll out for a qualifying session with the general goal of putting down your best lap. That goal is understandable, but it is not yet a resilient objective. On the out lap you catch traffic. The first flyer is compromised. The second lap begins with frustration because the number on the timer is already not what you wanted. At this point, the session is testing objective control.
The weak response is to keep chasing the original result as if the situation did not change. You brake later in a place where the car was already near its limit, add steering effort because you feel time slipping away, and begin driving against the previous lap instead of driving the current one. You may still produce a fast sector, but the system is fragile. One more interruption can turn the whole session into a rush.
The resilient response starts with the chunk-supported idea that a quality decision depends on identifying the primary objective, and that the objective may change based on the situation. The result objective was best lap. The new performance objective might be build enough space for one representative lap, or execute clean decision-making in traffic, or preserve tire and mind for the next opportunity. This is not lowering standards. It is matching the objective to reality.
Use the reset chain. Fact: the first flyer is gone. Objective: create and execute the next usable opportunity. Cue: space, breathe, process corner. Now your mind has a job. You are no longer trying to recover the whole session in one heroic corner. You are practicing the decision skill that lets the next lap happen.
In debrief, do not ask only whether the lap time was good. Ask whether you chose the correct objective when the situation changed. Ask whether your effort rose when frustration appeared. Ask whether your next-lap cue was clear enough to execute. If the answer is yes, you built resilience even if the final number was disappointing. If the answer is no, the next session has a concrete training target.
Worked example: the production car that will not turn in like you expected
A second example is technical rather than emotional at first. You are driving a production-based car and it does not respond to initial turn-in as quickly as the lighter, more centralized car you have in your head. Bentley explains that a car with more mass distributed away from the center has a higher moment of inertia, so it takes longer to react to the initial turn-in. The recommended compensation is an earlier turn-in and a more progressive steering input.
The adversity arrives when your expectation and the car disagree. If resilience is weak, you treat the delay as a threat. You add steering more abruptly, over-slow the car to make the apex, or begin blaming the platform before you have adapted. The bad mental move and the bad driving move reinforce each other. The more frustrated you get, the more abruptly you ask the car to do something it was already slow to do.
The resilient response is curiosity with a cue. Fact: this car needs more time to respond. Objective: adapt the input to the platform. Cue: earlier and progressive. That cue is small enough to use at speed and specific enough to change the lap. You are not telling yourself to be better in general. You are giving the car an input it can use.
This example also shows why resilience is not separate from technique. Your mental system protects your technical learning. If you stay defensive, you may never notice the moment-of-inertia problem. If you stay curious, you can connect the sensation to a mechanism and then to an action. The next debrief becomes useful: I was asking for rotation too late and too quickly. The next run will start the input earlier and slow the initial hand speed.
The success cue is not simply a faster lap. It is the feel of less fight at the apex. The car should need less last-second correction. Your steering should feel less like a command and more like a request made early enough for the chassis to answer. If the lap time follows, good. If it does not yet follow, you still know whether the resilience process worked because the debrief has cause, action, and next cue.
Common mistakes
The first common mistake is result-only identity. This happens when you treat the session result as the whole truth about your driving. A good lap means you are good. A bad lap means you are lost. The corpus pushes against this by emphasizing process, awareness, and the reality of peaks and valleys. What good looks like is different: you care about the result, but you measure the session by objective, execution, cause, and next action.
The second mistake is changing the plan too late or not at all. Drivers often enter with a broad objective, then keep forcing it after the situation has changed. Qualifying traffic, weather, car behavior, or pressure from another driver may require a new primary objective. What good looks like is an objective that can change deliberately. You do not drift from the plan emotionally. You update the plan consciously.
The third mistake is trying harder at the wrong thing. Bentley is clear that more effort applied to the wrong action rarely creates a good performance. On track, this can feel like tighter hands, sharper steering, rushed braking, or a desperate attempt to win back time immediately. Off track, it can look like over-analysis without a single executable cue. What good looks like is reducing effort first, then choosing the next useful input.
The fourth mistake is feeding the mind the wrong target. If you keep telling yourself not to miss the apex, not to be slow, not to mess up the next session, your attention is still circling the thing you do not want. The corpus says focus on what you want, and that what you think about is what you get. What good looks like is a positive driving cue: eyes early, progressive input, breathe and soften, objective first, one clean corner.
The fifth mistake is only reviewing failure. Some drivers take notes only when things go badly. That misses half the learning. The corpus emphasizes knowing why you won and why you lost, replaying successes, and recalling the feeling of past successes. What good looks like is reviewing strong sessions with the same discipline as weak ones. You identify what caused the good performance so you can repeat it under pressure.
The sixth mistake is using resilience as a mask for stubbornness. If you tell yourself to stay tough while ignoring what the car, track, or situation is telling you, you are not resilient. You are rigid. What good looks like is keeping the performance purpose while adapting the method. The track has its own personality. The car may need a different input. The session objective may change. Resilience keeps you learning through those changes.
Drill: three-session resilience programming
Use this drill at your next HPDE, test day, or club-racing practice. It takes three sessions and one notebook page. The count is three sessions. The active writing time is two minutes before each session and two minutes after each session. The success criterion is that by the end of the third session you can state the objective, adversity, response cue, and next action without needing a long emotional explanation.
Before session one, write one primary objective and one likely adversity. Keep the objective performance-based. Examples include smoother steering, better awareness of car response, less effort under pressure, or decision quality in traffic. Then write the response cue in one short phrase. For example: fact, objective, cue. Or: breathe, soften, progressive. Run one quick mental image of the adversity appearing and you using the cue.
During session one, do not try to manufacture trouble. Drive the planned objective. If the adversity appears, use the cue. If it does not appear, use the objective anyway. The point is to practice the mental pathway before it becomes urgent.
After session one, write five lines: objective, what happened, what input you fed your mind, what worked, next cue. If the session was poor, resist the dramatic story. If the session was good, resist skipping the analysis. Practice is programming in both directions.
Before session two, keep the same objective unless the first debrief shows that the situation has changed. If it has changed, deliberately update the objective and write why. This is the decision-making part of the drill. You are practicing the ability to change objectives based on situation, rather than reacting emotionally.
During session two, watch for effort. Your job is to notice the first physical sign of forcing. It may be grip pressure, breath, rushed vision, or the urge to recover time immediately. When you notice it, reduce effort and return to the cue. Success is noticing earlier than you normally would.
After session two, record the first sign of excess effort and whether the cue changed it. If you noticed it after the lap was already messy, that is still useful. The next target is earlier awareness.
Before session three, recall one past success that matches the feeling you want. Make it sensory: hands, eyes, breath, car response, debrief clarity. Then write the session objective and cue. This connects success recall with process rather than ego.
During session three, drive the objective and use the success feeling as the reference state. Afterward, write the same five-line debrief. The drill is complete if you have three objective-cue-debrief cycles and one clear next practice target. It is not complete because the lap time improved. The lap time may improve, but the drill measures whether your resilience system became more repeatable.
How this connects to related skills
This lesson prepares the ground for the sibling skill Recover once, not twice. When you already have a reset chain, the immediate recovery after a mistake becomes simpler. You are not inventing a response while the car is still moving and your frustration is high. You are running the pattern you practiced: fact, objective, cue.
It also prepares the ground for Turn disadvantage into strategic advantage. Strategic adaptation requires a mind that can identify the changed situation without being swallowed by it. If a disadvantage appears and your only response is emotional effort, you will struggle to see the useful option. If you can reset the objective, control effort, and ask awareness-building questions, you have the mental room to make a tactical decision.
Finally, this lesson connects to technical driving skills such as smooth steering, adapting to different tracks, and adapting to different cars. The corpus treats driving, racing, mental skills, physical skills, learning, and technique as interrelated rather than sequential. Resilience is one of the connectors. It keeps your attention available so you can keep learning the technical skill instead of defending yourself from the discomfort of not having it perfect yet.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | a4147ea3-257f-67b9-5fef-f56d4cfb427f | 134 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 12b38229-583d-d709-b629-b88b24921c14 | 164 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 99f6bb64-a187-8d5d-eea4-a145add7b3f0 | 108 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c179b4ca-b1cd-bbae-16ca-d15b1ecdfc12 | 11 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 0237a5bd-e2d4-724e-bc2e-ba13db924f66 | 11 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | cf3007c2-dd09-2b98-7892-86c3a5154dd5 | 521 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | ee4ddb39-cb81-0fa5-5322-b5aefed1e642 | 276 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 47f6de8d-9d56-5b6d-547a-f1e7bb92faaf | 152 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 4c99d7b1-8b24-7dbd-b21f-93757abf3896 | 608 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 80d45b1e-33cc-c371-d5ac-b259f0e0a04f | 15 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 016d903b-1097-3a32-e586-3dbb56704b19 | 18 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |