Celebrate the American icons without copying the myth

Generated from content/lms/motorsport-history-and-culture/05-the-people-who-defined-er/02-the-american-icons.md; edit the source file, not this page.

Source path: content/lms/motorsport-history-and-culture/05-the-people-who-defined-er/02-the-american-icons.md

Course: Read the track that shaped the sport

Module: Meet the people who defined eras

Estimated duration: 60 minutes

Why this lesson exists

American racing gives you a dangerous kind of inspiration. It gives you people whose names sound bigger than normal life: Mario Andretti, Richard Petty, Parnelli Jones, Cale Yarborough, Janet Guthrie, Don Garlits, Dan Gurney, Wally Parks, Johnny McDonald, Chris Economaki, Alan Johnson, and many others around them. The danger is not that you admire them. Admiration is part of why people come to racing in the first place. The danger is that you admire them in a way that teaches you nothing. If an icon becomes only a poster, a catchphrase, or a trophy list, you leave the lesson on the table.

The skill in this lesson is cultural reading. You are learning how to look at American motorsport icons and pull out usable patterns: what they practiced, what environments shaped them, what roles around them made the sport possible, and what parts of their example are portable to your HPDE or club-racing life. You are not being asked to become Mario Andretti, and you are not being asked to reduce an icon to one neat moral. You are learning to ask better questions of racing history.

The governing principle is simple: celebrate the icon, then decode the system that made the icon meaningful. American motorsport history is not only a sequence of star drivers. The bonded corpus repeatedly frames racing as an ecosystem. Under the Green says the sport includes the driver, mechanic, designer, sponsor, fan, journalist, promoter, volunteer, and family. It gives special attention to the relationship between grass roots racing and the professional scene. Alan Johnson's club-racing story shows the same pattern from the driver's side: before he became a four-time SCCA National champion, he was a beginner who watched, listened, helped around the edges, bought and prepared his own car, and served his apprenticeship as owner, driver, mechanic, and sponsor. Mario Andretti's foreword shows the other end of the ladder: a driver who moved through jalopies, midgets, sprint cars, stock cars, sports prototypes, championship cars, and Formula One machines while absorbing mechanical failures and emotional pressure across twenty years. Those are not isolated hero details. They are a map.

For an intermediate driver, that map matters because you already know racing is more complicated than going faster. You have felt the pull of lap time, pride, equipment, weather, traffic, money, instruction, and reputation. You may already have favorite drivers. The next step is to make your admiration disciplined. A useful icon study should leave you with at least one practice habit, one cultural insight, and one sharper question about your own development.

What an American icon is in this lesson

In this module, an American icon is not simply a person born in the United States. It is a figure who helps you understand the American racing environment: its grassroots base, its professional ambition, its many series, its mechanical self-reliance, its fan culture, its media culture, and its habit of mixing roles. Some icons are drivers. Some are builders, promoters, writers, officials, volunteers, and chroniclers. Some are famous because they won huge races. Some are important because they made it possible for races to exist, be understood, be funded, be staffed, be reported, or be remembered.

That broader definition is not sentimental. It is practical. If you only study winners, you learn to stare at outcomes. If you study the ecosystem, you learn where outcomes come from. You learn that a professional race day depends on preparation, organization, communication, promotion, spectators, media attention, and a pipeline from local participation to national achievement. The New York Times guide frames American racing growth as moving through tracks, drivers, and cars. Under the Green adds that millions of people involve themselves in motorsports in some way and that racing continues to grow despite persistent problems. That is the culture you are entering when you sign up for a school day, volunteer at a club event, crew for a friend, read a race report, or tow your own car through the gate.

This is also why celebration must include restraint. You can enjoy the legends without inventing details. The bonded corpus is strong on Andretti's range, Johnson's SCCA path, McDonald's journalistic role, the volunteer and fan ecosystem, and the grassroots-to-professional relationship. It is thinner on several other famous names. So the disciplined move is to separate what the source supports from what you have heard elsewhere. That is not academic nitpicking. It is the same habit you need in the car: see what is actually there, not what you wish were there.

The mechanism: icons compress a whole racing world

A racing icon becomes powerful because one career can compress a whole system into a story you can remember. Andretti's career compresses range. His foreword describes moving from low-dollar races into many types of machinery and many emotional situations. His short biography records a career that included a Formula Junior start at age thirteen, a 1978 Formula One world championship, the 1969 Indianapolis 500, national championships, dirt-track titles, and the Daytona 500. That is not a recommendation that you scatter your attention. It is a lesson in adaptability. A driver who passes through many categories has to keep separating surface differences from permanent fundamentals: how the car responds, what the race demands, what risk is worth taking, how pressure changes decision-making, and how much the machine can give.

Johnson's story compresses apprenticeship. He did not begin as a mythic prodigy in the source. He began around the edges of California Sports Car Club activity, doing non-essential jobs, talking, watching, listening, and learning. He then bought a Porsche Speedster, entered driver training one small step at a time, and lived the owner-driver-mechanic-sponsor reality. This is a very American club-racing icon pattern: you do not wait for a perfect ladder to appear. You learn the sport by entering its work. You develop because you show up, pay attention, prepare the car, absorb instruction, and keep going.

McDonald and Economaki compress the communications side. McDonald is presented as a veteran journalist who covered racing from Indianapolis to Sebring, from Baja to the Poconos, and wrote for newspapers, race programs, and national automotive magazines. His work included the Auto Racing All-American team, the Jerry Titus Memorial Trophy, promotion of an Auto Racing Hall of Fame, and leadership in the American Auto Racing Writers and Broadcasters Association. Radosta's guide credits Chris Economaki as informed, observant, accurate, and humorous. Under the Green captions Economaki at work for ABC Sports. The lesson here is that racing culture is partly built by people who notice, verify, explain, and preserve. Without them, icons become rumor. With them, a complicated sport becomes learnable.

The volunteer and fan material compresses participation. Under the Green describes booster organizations that answer questions, direct traffic, bring food, wear identifying clothing, and help produce the event. It also says that without boosters and volunteers, there might not be an auto race at all. The fan sections show people bringing signs, cheering heroes, and needing more than one event before they can decide what kind of racing they like. This matters because a driver who understands only the cockpit misunderstands the sport. You may be the person in the harness for twenty minutes, but the event around you is the product of many people performing less glamorous tasks correctly.

So the mechanism is compression. An icon is a shortcut into a larger pattern. Your job is to unpack the shortcut without flattening it.

Sub-skill 1: separate the achievement from the lesson

When you study an American icon, begin by writing down the achievement, then write down the lesson in a separate sentence. Keep the two apart. Andretti's achievements include major wins and titles across multiple disciplines. The lesson might be adaptability across cars and contexts. Johnson's achievement is becoming a nationally respected four-time SCCA National champion after coming up through club racing. The lesson might be patient apprenticeship and self-sufficient preparation. McDonald's achievement is a long career as a respected racing journalist and organizer within the racing-writing community. The lesson might be that racing history depends on accurate observation and communication.

This separation protects you from a common mistake: worshiping the result while ignoring the behavior. A trophy list is not a practice plan. A biography full of dramatic events is not necessarily a technique manual. Johnson makes that point directly in his discussion of driver biographies: many are entertaining because they show how drivers got started and what paths their careers took, but they often focus more on exciting events than on the techniques that made the drivers great. For your purposes, that warning is gold. Read the story, enjoy the story, then ask what behavior you can actually practice.

In your notebook, use three lines. Line one: What did this person do? Line two: What environment made that possible? Line three: What can I practice next event? If line three is vague, you have not decoded the icon yet. If your line three says be fearless, win more, or drive like Mario, you have a slogan, not a skill. A better line three might be: watch one faster driver through a full lap and name where they are patient; ask one crew member or volunteer what makes the event run smoothly; review my last session notes before the next session instead of relying on memory; or study one unfamiliar series to understand how the car and format change the driver's job.

Sub-skill 2: trace the ladder from local to professional

American racing culture makes more sense when you see the ladder. Under the Green explicitly pays attention to the relationship between grass roots racing and the professional scene. Johnson's story makes that relationship concrete. He moved from curiosity, to club involvement, to driver training, to self-prepared competition, to national respect. That path matters because most Tracky drivers live closer to Johnson's beginning than Andretti's championship peak.

The useful question is not whether you will become a professional. The useful question is how professional habits appear early. Johnson's path includes watching, listening, learning, entering a training program step by step, preparing his own car, and carrying multiple responsibilities. Those are not glamorous, but they are trainable. You can practice showing up early enough to learn the paddock rhythm. You can learn what your car needs before you ask it for speed. You can write useful post-session notes while the sensations are still fresh. You can volunteer or crew so you understand what the day requires from people outside your own run group.

This is where celebration becomes useful. Instead of saying American racing is full of self-made heroes, ask what self-made meant in the source. It meant learning at the edges before driving. It meant training in small steps. It meant funding, preparing, and driving the same effort. It meant not treating the cockpit as the only classroom. If you take that seriously, your own development becomes less passive. You stop waiting for a single perfect instructor comment to transform you. You build more ways to learn.

Sub-skill 3: read versatility without copying overreach

Andretti's range is the richest driver example in the bond. The source describes him driving many different forms of race car over twenty years and experiencing both mechanical malfunctions and emotional situations. His biography adds honors across Formula One, Indianapolis, national championships, dirt track, and NASCAR. The easy but wrong takeaway is that greatness means doing everything at once. The better takeaway is that greatness requires learning how to transfer fundamentals without pretending every car is the same.

For an intermediate HPDE or club driver, this becomes a practical habit. When you watch or read about a driver crossing disciplines, ask what changes and what remains. The race format changes. The car's mass, power, grip, and visibility change. The traffic pattern changes. The culture of the paddock changes. But the need to concentrate, prepare, adapt to mechanical condition, manage pressure, and understand the car remains. The source supports this broader view through Andretti's career range and through Johnson's emphasis on open-mindedness and concentration as preparation keys.

Do not use versatility as an excuse to thrash. A driver who jumps from idea to idea without a learning loop is not being versatile. They are being unstructured. The icon-study version of versatility is disciplined comparison. Watch a NASCAR stock car race, an Indy-style oval race, a road-racing event, and a club race with the same question each time: what is the driver managing besides speed? You will see traffic, equipment, pressure, risk, and opportunity in different proportions. Then bring that back to your own next session. Ask what your car and group are asking from you today, not what some other car asked from an icon in another era.

Sub-skill 4: include the people who make the race possible

The corpus will not let you keep the lens only on drivers. Under the Green opens its purpose by promising to introduce the people involved in making auto racing the sport it is. It names drivers, mechanics, designers, sponsors, fans, and others as part of the full picture. The photo captions around team members, owners, crew chiefs, mechanics, and a driver-owner working alone reinforce that racing work is distributed. The volunteer material makes the point even sharper: without boosters and volunteers, the promotion would be hard to organize and there might not be a race.

This changes how you behave at an event. If you celebrate American icons well, you do not treat non-driving roles as background scenery. You notice the grid worker who keeps cars moving. You notice the corner worker who holds the day together from a station most drivers barely look at. You notice the person towing a small open trailer with the same seriousness as the pro transporters on television. You notice the instructor who gives the same beginner briefing with patience for the tenth time that weekend. You notice the family member, crew friend, or mechanic who absorbs the stress around the driver.

That attention is not politeness only. It improves your racing intelligence. The driver who understands the whole event tends to make cleaner decisions. They know why schedules slip, why flags matter, why paddock movement must be predictable, why car preparation is not someone else's problem, and why a reputation is built as much by conduct as by pace. The American icon lesson is that racing greatness sits on a base of ordinary competence repeated by many people.

Sub-skill 5: read media as part of the sport, not outside it

The bonded chunks spend real space on communicators, publications, journalism, and coverage. Andretti's foreword says improved television coverage increased appetite for news and information about all aspects of the sport. McDonald's biography lists newspapers, race programs, automotive magazines, radio, television, and professional writing organizations. Radosta's acknowledgments show how accuracy can require letters, phone calls, borrowed files, records, critique, and people willing to split hairs. Johnson recommends racing publications as background for a developing driver, especially for keeping up with U.S. road racing, European racing, technical information, race cars, and courses.

For you, the media lesson is not to become a journalist unless that is your path. It is to become a cleaner consumer of racing information. Do not let highlight clips become your only teacher. Do not assume a dramatic biography contains the driving technique you need. Do not build your model of racing from one broadcast angle or one famous crash. Read reports, watch full races when you can, compare sources, and ask what is being emphasized. Is the coverage teaching car behavior, race strategy, event organization, or only personality? Each has value, but they are not the same value.

This also helps you keep the sibling lessons separate. The Schumacher-Senna-Prost lesson belongs to a different era and comparison set. The champions-into-skills lesson handles general skill extraction from champions. The belonging lesson handles who gets recognized and who gets left out. This lesson's media angle is narrower: American icons are partly made legible by writers, broadcasters, publications, and fans. If you want to celebrate them honestly, you have to notice the people and channels that carried their stories.

Sub-skill 6: let fan culture teach attention, not just loyalty

Under the Green's fan material is lively because it shows hero loyalty directly. Fans bring signs for Richard, AJ, Big Daddy, Mario, Cale, and others. They want their hero to know they are present, and they want the world to know who their hero is. That is a real part of motorsport culture. The same section also gives better advice than most hero worship does: watch the backfield, because some of the best racing action occurs among cars trying to become frontrunners, and do not judge all racing from one event because it takes a few visits and different events to learn what you like.

That is the mature version of being a fan. You can cheer for a hero and still train your eye. At your next event, do not only watch the fastest car in the fastest group. Watch the middle of a run group where two drivers have similar pace and different strengths. Watch how a less powerful car survives by being tidy. Watch how a novice group forms gaps, loses them, and reforms them. Watch how a calm driver handles being caught. This is the track-day version of watching the backfield. You are not looking for celebrity. You are looking for racecraft in formation.

If you feel defensive when your favorite driver is criticized, that is a cue to shift from loyalty to learning. Ask what the driver did well. Ask what the car, rules, era, and competition made difficult. Ask what you can verify from the source. That shift keeps admiration from turning into blindness.

Calibration cues: how you know you are improving at this skill

You are improving when your icon notes get more specific and less inflated. Early notes often sound like this: Andretti was versatile; Johnson worked hard; McDonald loved racing. Better notes sound like this: Andretti's range suggests I should compare what stays constant across cars; Johnson's path suggests I should use non-driving roles as learning time; McDonald's career reminds me to preserve accurate debriefs before memory edits the session.

You are improving when you can name at least four roles around a racing icon without treating them as minor. Driver, mechanic, owner, crew chief, promoter, journalist, broadcaster, volunteer, sponsor, fan, and family can all matter depending on the example. The corpus gives you permission to see that whole picture.

You are improving when your admiration changes your behavior in small ways. You write the debrief sooner after the session because Johnson's race-note habit makes timing matter. You watch the backfield because McDonald says the best racing action is not always at the front. You thank a volunteer because the booster chapter makes the event's dependence visible. You read a race report with an eye for accuracy because Radosta's acknowledgments show how much work accuracy can take.

You are improving when you stop forcing every icon into the same mold. Andretti is not Johnson. Johnson is not McDonald. McDonald is not a booster member. A fan sign is not a championship. A Hall of Fame effort is not a braking technique. The skill is to let each figure teach the lesson their evidence supports.

Failure modes and recovery

The first failure mode is poster thinking. You keep the icon as an image and never ask what behavior sits underneath. Recovery is to write the three-line study: achievement, environment, practice.

The second failure mode is trophy-count thinking. You rank names but cannot describe how their paths differed. Recovery is to trace series, roles, and ladder. Andretti's cross-disciplinary record and Johnson's club path are different kinds of evidence.

The third failure mode is cockpit-only thinking. You treat the driver as the whole sport. Recovery is to name the support system before you name the result. Under the Green makes this unavoidable by including mechanics, designers, sponsors, fans, volunteers, communicators, and promoters.

The fourth failure mode is entertainment-only reading. You read biographies for drama and assume you have learned technique. Recovery is to remember Johnson's warning that many biographies emphasize exciting events more than technique. Enjoy the drama, then look for a transferable habit.

The fifth failure mode is unsupported expansion. You know a famous name from outside the bonded corpus and fill in details from memory. Recovery is to say what the source actually supports and ask for more source material when needed. That discipline is part of respecting history.

The sixth failure mode is one-event judgment. You attend or watch one race and decide what the whole sport is. Recovery is to follow McDonald's fan advice in spirit: sample multiple events and pay attention to different parts of the field.

The practice standard

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to perform an icon study in ten minutes. Choose a figure. Identify the supported achievement. Identify the environment. Identify the role category: driver, builder, communicator, organizer, volunteer, fan, or hybrid. State one behavior you can practice. State one thing you do not know yet and would need more source material to claim. That last sentence matters. Honest celebration includes the humility to stop where evidence stops.

When you do this well, American icons become more than names. Andretti becomes a study in range and adaptation. Johnson becomes a study in apprenticeship and self-sufficiency. McDonald and Economaki become studies in how racing is recorded and explained. Volunteers and fans become studies in how a sport becomes an event. The achievement stays impressive, but it stops being distant. It becomes a set of questions you can carry into the paddock.

Worked example: Mario Andretti as the versatility model

Use Andretti as the cleanest driver-centered example in this bond. The source gives you more than a trophy line. In the foreword, Andretti describes waiting for green flags in races where the purse could be small or very large, then describes winning in many types of racing: jalopies, midgets, sprint cars, stockers, sports prototypes, championship cars, and Formula One machines. The biography adds that he began at age thirteen in a Formula Junior car, became the 1978 Formula One world champion, won the 1969 Indianapolis 500, earned three national championships, won dirt-track titles, and won the Daytona 500.

Do not turn that into a vague command to drive everything. The usable intermediate-driver lesson is transfer. Andretti's American-icon value is that his story forces you to ask what a driver carries from one car to another. If the machine changes from dirt track to stock car to prototype to Formula One, the driver cannot be relying only on one familiar set of sensations. He has to keep reading the car, adapting to the race, and surviving mechanical and emotional variation.

At your next event, borrow the structure, not the resume. Pick one session and name what is specific to your car today: tire state, brake feel, visibility, traffic density, weather, and the pace spread in your group. Then name what should remain constant no matter the car: concentration, progressive inputs, awareness of traffic, respect for mechanical condition, and a clear post-session debrief. The icon study turns into a driving study when you can say exactly what changes and what remains.

Worked example: Alan Johnson as the club-racing apprenticeship model

Johnson's example is valuable because it begins where many drivers actually live. The source says he did not present himself as an extraordinary gifted athlete. He started as a more ordinary participant around the edges of sports car racing, doing California Sports Car Club activities, talking, watching, listening, and learning before he began racing. His first sports car in the source was a Porsche Speedster. He went through driver training one small step at a time, bought and prepared his own car, and funded the effort himself while living the owner-driver-mechanic-sponsor combination. Later he became a four-time SCCA National champion.

The lesson is not poverty romance or suffering for its own sake. The lesson is that apprenticeship has structure. Johnson did not only drive. He observed. He participated in non-driving jobs. He entered training. He learned the car. He accepted small steps. That is a strong corrective for intermediate drivers who want the next breakthrough but have not built the learning environment around themselves.

Turn Johnson's path into a checklist for one club weekend. Before the event, prepare the car enough that you can explain its condition to an instructor without guessing. During the event, spend one session break watching another group instead of scrolling or hiding in the paddock. After each session, record the useful information while it is fresh. If you can leave the event with better car knowledge, better track knowledge, and better self-knowledge, you have honored the Johnson pattern more honestly than if you only talked about becoming fast someday.

Worked example: Johnny McDonald and Chris Economaki as the memory of the sport

Driver icons are easier to celebrate, but the bonded corpus keeps pulling you toward communicators. McDonald is presented as a journalist who covered racing from Indianapolis to Sebring, from Baja to the Poconos. His biography connects him to newspapers, race programs, national automotive magazines, radio, television, the Auto Racing All-American team, the Jerry Titus Memorial Trophy, Hall of Fame promotion, and leadership of the American Auto Racing Writers and Broadcasters Association. Radosta's acknowledgments present Chris Economaki as deeply informed, observant, accurate, and funny, and another Under the Green caption places Economaki at work for ABC Sports.

The practical lesson is that motorsport culture depends on accurate memory. If nobody records what happened, checks facts, explains context, and preserves the story, later fans and drivers inherit fragments. This matters to you because your own development has the same problem at a smaller scale. If you do not record what happened in a session, your memory will simplify it. The good lap will get better in the retelling. The mistake will become someone else's fault. The car problem will become vaguer with each hour.

Use the communicator icon as a debrief model. Write what happened before you write what it means. Separate observation from interpretation. Observation: brake pedal got longer after lap four. Interpretation: possible heat, fluid, pad, or technique issue. Observation: traffic caught me at corner entry twice. Interpretation: I need an earlier mirror check or a different point-by plan. This is how the culture lesson becomes a driving habit.

Common mistakes: what bad celebration looks like

The first mistake is flattening every icon into bravery. Good looks like naming the actual supported pattern. Andretti teaches range and adaptation in this corpus. Johnson teaches apprenticeship and self-prepared club development. McDonald and Economaki teach communication and memory. Volunteers teach event dependence. Fans teach attention and loyalty.

The second mistake is treating professional glamour as the only valuable part of racing. Johnson notes that professional racing can be rewarding and more glamorous, but his own path and the broader Under the Green framing keep club racing central. Good looks like respecting the serious work inside amateur and local environments.

The third mistake is ignoring the backfield. The fan guidance in Under the Green says some of the best action happens among cars trying to become frontrunners. Good looks like watching the mid-pack and novice groups for usable lessons in traffic, patience, mistakes, and recovery.

The fourth mistake is confusing a biography with a technique manual. Johnson warns that many biographies focus on exciting events rather than the techniques that made drivers great. Good looks like enjoying the story while still asking what practice behavior is actually supported.

The fifth mistake is erasing the support system. Good looks like naming the mechanic, owner, crew chief, promoter, journalist, broadcaster, booster, volunteer, sponsor, family, and fan where the source supports them. The American racing icon is often surrounded by people whose work makes the achievement visible or possible.

The sixth mistake is overclaiming from thin evidence. This bond mentions Janet Guthrie by caption and several famous names through endorsements, acknowledgments, fan signs, or interview references, but it does not give enough biographical material to teach all of them deeply. Good looks like saying the bond is thin and asking for more source material instead of pretending.

Drill: the three-line American icon study

Do this drill at your next event or while reviewing one race broadcast. The drill has three rounds, and each round takes about ten minutes.

Round one is the achievement line. Choose one icon from the lesson and write one sourced sentence about what the person did. Use Andretti for range, Johnson for club-racing apprenticeship, McDonald or Economaki for communication, or the volunteer and fan material for event culture. Success criterion: the sentence contains no unsupported detail.

Round two is the environment line. Write what had to exist around that person for the achievement or contribution to matter. For Andretti, the environment includes multiple forms of racing and broad public interest. For Johnson, it includes SCCA club activity, training, self-preparation, and the owner-driver-mechanic-sponsor reality. For McDonald and Economaki, it includes publications, broadcasts, records, accuracy work, and an audience that wants to understand the sport. For volunteers, it includes promoters, booster organizations, traffic direction, questions, food, and event labor.

Round three is the practice line. Write one action you will take before the next session or next event. The action must be small enough to complete. Examples: record post-session notes immediately; watch the middle of another run group for five laps; ask a volunteer one respectful question about how the event runs; compare one race report with one broadcast summary; list what changed and what stayed constant after driving in different weather or traffic.

The drill is successful when you can show a direct chain from icon, to environment, to your action. If the chain breaks, you are back in poster thinking. Tighten the claim until it is true.

When this lesson should point you elsewhere

This lesson deliberately avoids becoming a general greatest-drivers ranking. If you want to compare eras and personalities such as Schumacher, Senna, and Prost, use the sibling lesson on that era. If you want a broader method for converting any champion into a practice skill, use the sibling lesson on decoding champions into skills. If you want to challenge who gets recognized and who is left out, use the belonging lesson.

Stay here when the question is specifically American racing culture: why American icons are tied to grassroots ladders, multiple disciplines, self-preparation, professional spectacle, media, volunteers, fans, and the people behind the scenes. The more you can see those pieces together, the more useful your celebration becomes.

Author Review

No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.

Sources

#	Document	Chunk	Pages	Score	Collection
1	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	f999b3b7-8854-26a2-e0b5-54419e1dac53	11	1	uio_books_raw_v1
2	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	0ec1081d-adc1-ee14-c03b-07ea067ed33e	231	1	uio_books_raw_v1
3	Driving in competition None Johnson Alan 1935- None	f543ab5a-1dff-ae84-4e84-53dd5f48563c	8	1	uio_books_raw_v1
4	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	98a9988b-9de2-c881-0dcb-44189d21a999	2	1	uio_books_raw_v1
5	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	8b743169-c1c7-606b-5f09-eb5da3fccfca	92	1	uio_books_raw_v1
6	Driving in competition None Johnson Alan 1935- None	6dd2e6d5-d154-56cc-0b84-25cbb07bd574	18	1	uio_books_raw_v1
7	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	5a752d77-5af5-5150-064b-75929ad904f9	197	1	uio_books_raw_v1
8	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	387365dc-4c0d-b10b-7b8a-da25103135f3	218	1	uio_books_raw_v1
9	The New York times complete guide to auto racing Radosta John S	c5ed5acb-49ec-b493-2840-b9fa05ea73e6	19	1	uio_books_raw_v1
10	The New York times complete guide to auto racing Radosta John S	c4c516de-d1b4-fa59-2007-5bd4775728b3	15	1	uio_books_raw_v1
11	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	389957e3-1b85-b24b-3069-080132d4c764	171	1	uio_books_raw_v1
12	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	aa9d695f-be3c-25d7-e29c-ee871c02ac48	194	1	uio_books_raw_v1
13	Driving in competition None Johnson Alan 1935- None	affec95e-99b0-690c-9949-baa3a4351721	155	1	uio_books_raw_v1
14	Driving in competition None Johnson Alan 1935- None	1cf8ccc5-ed81-7e18-9129-2492609f97d9	53	1	uio_books_raw_v1
15	Under the green A complete guide to auto racing Johnny McDonald	3da00d36-7712-af2b-3506-5475a803ad3a	160	1	uio_books_raw_v1