Steer attention with self-talk
Generated from
content/lms/mental-game-ii-perceptual-science/05-stabilize-attention-under-pressure/02-engineer-refocus-reminders.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/mental-game-ii-perceptual-science/05-stabilize-attention-under-pressure/02-engineer-refocus-reminders.md
Course: See sooner and decide faster at speed
Module: Keep attention functional when intensity rises
Estimated duration: 50 minutes
Principle
Self-talk is a steering input for your attention. It is not magic, motivation, or a way to talk yourself into bravery you have not earned. It is a small mental control that points your mind toward the next useful driving cue. When pressure rises, your attention can get pulled toward nerves, outcome, lap time, the car beside you, the mistake you just made, or the fear of making the next one. Good self-talk gives your mind a job that is closer to the driving task: look, feel, breathe, release, be smooth, choose the next compromise, or gather the sensory input you need.
The core rule is simple: say the thing that sends attention toward the behavior or sensation you want next. The bonded corpus supports that rule in several ways. Bentley treats mental performance as central to driving performance, not as a side topic. He also says the mind can be programmed, that practice becomes programming, that quality output depends on quality input, and that you should focus on what you want rather than what you do not want. That combination is the foundation of this lesson. Self-talk works when it improves the quality of the next input and the next action. It fails when it becomes noise, judgment, or a long speech that arrives too late.
Think of the self-talk phrase as the same kind of tool as a steering correction. A good steering correction is small, timed, and matched to what the car needs. A bad one is late, too large, and repeated because it did not solve the first problem. The same is true in your head. A useful cue is short enough to use at speed, specific enough to change behavior, and positive enough that it tells your mind where to go. A bad cue is vague, negative, or outcome obsessed. Telling yourself not to mess up leaves the mind circling the mistake. Telling yourself to feel the front tire, breathe, and drive the next exit gives it an immediate task.
Why it works
Driving at speed is an input-quality problem before it is an output problem. You do not just need more effort. You need better visual, kinesthetic, and auditory information, then you need to convert that information into precise control movement. Bentley repeatedly ties improvement to sensory input: vision, balance, feel, touch, g-forces, vibration, pitch and roll, and hearing. He also warns against moving the controls faster just because you want to go faster. The faster driver is not the one with the busiest hands or the loudest internal voice. The faster driver is the one whose mind receives the right information early enough and whose body responds with economy.
Self-talk is one way to protect that information stream. Before a session, it gives your brain something to do other than get nervous. During a session, it can return you to the present cue instead of the result. After a mistake, it can stop the mental replay from consuming the next braking zone. In a race or a crowded HPDE group, it can point you toward the decision you already programmed in visualization instead of letting surprise make the decision for you.
This is why self-talk must be linked to an actual driving skill. If the phrase only makes you feel better but does not change what you see, feel, or do, it is not yet a driving cue. A useful phrase might aim at relaxation under pressure, smoother control movement, earlier sensory gathering, or a better decision. It might remind you to use less effort when intensity rises. It might remind you that the car with a high moment of inertia needs an earlier, more progressive turn-in. It might remind you to ask what can be done to go faster after the session instead of asking that question mid-corner.
What self-talk is not
Self-talk is not a replacement for technique. If your hands are rough, you still need to practice steering economy. If your vision is late, you still need vision work. If you have not rehearsed passing situations, a racecraft phrase will not manufacture a clean pass. Bentley’s Formula Ford example matters here. The quick, decisive passes came after repeated mental practice of passing situations with a competitor. The phrase used in the car would only be useful because the decision pattern was already rehearsed.
Self-talk is also not constant narration. Intermediate drivers often talk to themselves too much when they discover mental skills. They turn a useful cue into a running commentary: brake here, turn here, watch the apex, be smooth, do not overdrive, breathe, check mirrors, get back to throttle. That is overload. Bentley warns against taking on every strategy all at once and emphasizes choosing the areas where you have the most to gain, then adding more when the timing feels right. The goal is not to fill your helmet with words. The goal is to install a small number of mental programs that eventually run without much conscious effort.
The mechanism: attention, belief, and behavior
The corpus supports three linked mechanisms. First, self-talk directs attention. The mind cannot aim at nothing. If you try to stop thinking about an error, the error remains the center of the instruction. A better cue names the wanted target. Second, repeated cue use becomes programming. Practiced phrases tied to practiced actions become part of your routine, especially when used in imagery and then on track. Third, the cue influences control behavior. A cue about smooth hands, less wheel, or relaxed effort should show up as a calmer body and a more economical car.
That does not mean every phrase will work for every driver. Bentley is explicit that mental programs are individual. What works for one driver may not work for another, and the program needs experimentation and fine-tuning. Your job is to build a personal cue set, test it honestly, and keep the phrases that produce better attention and better driving. If a phrase sounds good in the paddock but disappears under pressure, simplify it. If it makes you tense, replace it. If it pulls attention to the outcome instead of the process, rewrite it.
The technique: build a cue that can survive speed
Start with the driving problem, not the phrase. Pick one place where pressure disrupts your attention. Maybe you judge yourself after a missed apex. Maybe traffic makes your eyes shrink to the bumper ahead. Maybe a high-speed corner makes your hands fast and stiff. Maybe you get nervous before the session and your first two laps are mentally scattered. Then decide what kind of attention you need in that place.
A good cue has four parts, even if the final phrase is only one or two words. It has a target, a timing point, a sensory proof, and a debrief question. The target is the wanted action or sensation. The timing point is where you use it. The sensory proof is how you know the cue changed something. The debrief question is how you decide whether to keep it.
For example, if pressure makes your hands abrupt, the target is economy of movement. The timing point might be the last breath before turn-in. The proof is that the steering input feels slower and the car needs fewer corrections. The debrief question is whether you carried the same or better entry speed without adding wheel angle. That cue is grounded in the driving material: more precise and gentle control movement, less steering, and smoothness. The phrase itself can be very short. You do not need a sentence. You need a trigger.
If nerves before a run make your mind race, the target is calm readiness. The timing point is the buckled-in wait before release from grid or the final minute before leaving the paddock. The proof is that you can visualize the first lap accurately and that your mind has a task other than being nervous. The debrief question is whether the first lap felt more organized. This is grounded in Bentley’s relaxation and mental imagery material, including the idea that pre-run mental work gives the brain something useful to do.
If a racecraft situation pulls you into panic, the target is the decision you already practiced. The timing point is the moment you see the other car’s move. The proof is that you choose the next compromise rather than react blindly. The debrief question is whether the decision was quick, assertive, and aligned with your rehearsed plan. This is grounded in the Formula Ford visualization story and in the claim that the best-prepared mind is more likely to choose the best compromise.
Sub-skill 1: phrase the wanted action
The first sub-skill is wording. Do not build cues around the thing you fear. Build them around what you want your attention to do. The corpus says to focus on what you want, not what you do not want, and that what you think about is what you get. For driving, that means the phrase should be pointed toward a positive task.
Bad wording points attention backward or downward. It says do not miss this, do not be slow, do not turn in early, do not blow the pass. Good wording points attention forward. It says next cue, feel grip, slow hands, breathe, early eyes, progressive turn, or drive the exit. The exact words are yours, but the grammar should point toward the next controllable thing.
Intermediate drivers sometimes resist this because negative wording feels honest. If you keep overdriving corner entry, saying do not overdrive feels like naming the problem. But the car does not respond to honesty. It responds to the next action. The better cue is one that changes the action: release earlier, softer hands, feel the front, or wait for the car. Those phrases do not deny the problem. They turn the problem into a controllable cue.
Sub-skill 2: keep the cue small enough for the cockpit
A cue that works while sitting at home may be too long for the cockpit. At speed, you do not have room for an essay. The cue must fit into the timing window where it will be used. On the grid, you can use a short routine. On a long straight, you can reset your breathing and choose the next focus. In the braking zone, the cue has to be tiny. Near turn-in, it has to be even smaller.
The smaller cue is not less intelligent. It is more usable. Bentley’s own approach to reminders at the track is useful here: key messages work because they can be picked up and applied. Your self-talk should function the same way. It should be something you can actually use while the car is moving. If the phrase needs explanation every time, it is not yet a cue. Move the explanation to your notebook and keep the cockpit phrase short.
Sub-skill 3: attach the cue to a sensory channel
Because racing improvement depends heavily on sensory information, your cue should often point to a sense. You can use vision, feel, balance, g-load, vibration, pitch and roll, or hearing. This is not the same as telling yourself to be aware of everything. That becomes vague. Instead, select one sensory channel that will help the next task.
If the car is sliding and you are late to recognize it, a feel-based cue may help. If your speed sense is poor, a cue that opens vision and listening may help. If your hands are rough, a cue that makes you feel the steering load and car rotation may help. If braking pressure makes you brace, a breathing cue may let the rest of the senses come back online. The cue is a pointer, not the whole skill. It sends your attention to the information you need.
This matters because input quality and output quality are linked. If your cue improves sensory input, your correction can be smaller and earlier. If your cue narrows attention, your correction will probably be late and larger. That is the difference between a cue that steers attention and a cue that merely repeats anxiety.
Sub-skill 4: pair mental cues with physical economy
The physical side of this lesson is control economy. Bentley is blunt that drivers who think faster control movement automatically makes them faster are wrong. The more precise and gentle driver is usually better. He also emphasizes slower steering inputs without slowing the car. That gives you a direct way to test self-talk.
If your phrase is useful, it should help your body do less unnecessary work. Under pressure, many drivers add effort. They squeeze the wheel, turn more than needed, jab at controls, hold their breath, and then blame the car for being nervous. A good cue reverses that pattern. It asks for less effort, smoother hands, more progressive input, or calmer release. The cue does not slow the car down. It slows the unnecessary movement.
This is one of the cleanest calibration points in the lesson. If your cue makes your body busy, it is probably wrong for that moment. If it makes your body quieter while the car speed stays the same or improves, it is doing useful work.
Sub-skill 5: separate in-car cueing from debrief thinking
Self-talk is not a substitute for analysis. It is a way to keep the analysis from invading the wrong moment. Bentley’s debrief question about what can be done to go faster belongs after the run, in the paddock, in your notes, with video, data, an instructor, an engineer, or yourself. Mid-corner, that same question can become distraction.
Use the in-car cue to drive the next action. Use the post-session debrief to decide whether the cue was right. This separation is important for intermediate drivers because you now know enough to analyze many things. That knowledge is valuable, but not all at once and not during every input. Your job in the car is to execute the next cue. Your job after the session is to understand the cause of good and poor performance and improve the program.
Timing: where to use the cue
Pre-session self-talk is for state selection. Before you go out, use a short routine to settle the mind, rehearse the first lap, and choose one primary cue. Bentley describes mental imagery as a way to program the mind and notes that visualization before going on track automatically forces focus and concentration. He also timed mental laps against real laps when he knew the track well. That gives you a useful model: before a session, do not simply hope you will focus. Give the mind a lap to drive.
Out-lap self-talk is for sensory calibration. The out-lap is not where you solve every problem. It is where you bring the senses online. Choose one perception cue. It might be about vision, grip feel, brake feel, or body relaxation. The goal is to start gathering quality information early, not to prove pace.
Hot-lap self-talk is for the one place pressure is damaging you most. Do not cue every corner. Pick one corner, one phase, or one decision point. If the issue is entry, use the cue at entry. If the issue is exit impatience, use it before throttle application. If the issue is traffic, use it when you notice the other car affecting your attention. The cue should arrive before the error, not after it.
Post-error self-talk is for returning to the next useful cue. This lesson should not duplicate the sibling lesson on stopping judgment, but the connection is direct. After a surprise or mistake, the purpose of self-talk is to stop the useless loop and get back to driving. The cue should not litigate the error. It should rejoin the next task. The review happens later.
Post-session self-talk is for programming the next repetition. Debrief what changed. Did the cue appear at the right time. Did it improve sensory input. Did it improve control economy. Did it survive pressure. If not, change the cue, not your whole driving identity. Bentley’s mental-programming advice is long-term and experimental. You are building a program that becomes natural through consistent use.
Pressure: how self-talk changes when intensity rises
Pressure does not require a louder cue. It requires a clearer cue. Bentley’s pressure guidance points toward relaxation and less effort, not heroic force. Under higher intensity, the cue should usually become simpler. If your normal phrase has three words, the pressure version might have one. If your normal routine includes several mental steps, the pressure version might be a breath and the next target.
This is especially important in competition and advanced HPDE traffic. Driving requires constant compromise: line, tire condition, traffic, strategy, car balance, and changing conditions. The driver who chooses the best compromise is most likely to come out ahead. Self-talk helps only if it improves the compromise. It should make you more decisive, not more emotional. It should help you choose the exit, the gap, the early acceleration plan, or the safer reset.
Use the Formula Ford story as your model. Bentley and his competitor spent hours talking through passing moves and alternate situations. They practiced hundreds of races in their minds. When the situations arrived, the passes felt easier because they had already rehearsed them. That is not a story about a magic phrase. It is a story about programming decisions so the cue can unlock them under pressure.
Calibration cues: how you know it is working
The first calibration cue is felt calm without sleepiness. You are not trying to become dull. You are trying to become available. A useful cue leaves you more able to see, feel, and hear the car. You notice g-load, tire behavior, pitch and roll, vibration, and the timing of your own inputs. If the cue makes you blank or passive, it is too vague. If it makes you aggressive and tense, it is pointed at the wrong thing.
The second cue is physical economy. Your hands should feel quieter. Steering should be more progressive. You should need less unnecessary wheel. Throttle and brake movements should feel more deliberate rather than rushed. This comes straight from the driving material on gentle control manipulation, less steering, and smoother inputs.
The third cue is recoverability. A self-talk program is useful when it survives something going wrong. If a missed apex destroys the next three corners, the cue is not installed yet. If the next straight is enough to breathe, name the next task, and return to driving, the program is improving.
The fourth cue is debrief quality. After the session, you should be able to report what happened in driver language: where the cue was used, what you felt, what changed, and what to test next. Bentley values debriefing with an engineer, mechanic, instructor, or yourself, and making notes about the car and your driving. A cue that leaves no debrief trail is hard to improve.
The fifth cue is imagery accuracy. If you use pre-session visualization, time a mental lap when you know the track well. Bentley used a stopwatch and looked for mental laps close to real laps. You do not need to make that a rigid rule at every HPDE, but the principle is useful. The more accurate the mental lap, the more likely the cue is tied to real driving rather than fantasy.
Using video and data without overclaiming
The bonded corpus mentions learning from video and data acquisition, but this lesson does not have a full telemetry methods packet. Keep the review simple. If you have video or data, use it to check whether the cue changed the behavior it was meant to change. For a smooth-hands cue, look for less abrupt wheel movement or fewer visible corrections. For a progressive-turn cue in a heavier production car, look for whether the turn-in starts earlier and develops more gradually. For a relaxation cue, look for whether the next lap returns to normal pace and line after a surprise.
Do not use data to create ten new cues. That defeats the lesson. Use it to decide whether the one cue earned another session. If the evidence is unclear, keep the test narrow. One cue, one corner or phase, one session, one debrief.
Cross-references inside this module
This lesson sits beside lessons on judgment, scan narrowing, surprise recovery, and driving the cue instead of expectation. Self-talk is the active phrase layer that supports those skills. When judgment appears, the cue returns you to the next task. When intensity narrows the scan, the cue opens attention toward the wanted sensory input. When surprise interrupts the lap, the cue gives you a recovery step. When expectation gets ahead of evidence, the cue points you back to what the car is actually telling you.
Keep the boundaries clean. This lesson is not a full vision lesson, a full racecraft lesson, or a full relaxation lesson. It is the method for designing and testing the words you use to point attention toward those skills under pressure.
The standard for this lesson
By the end of this lesson, you should have a small personal cue set, not a motivational slogan. You should know where each cue is used, what behavior it targets, what sensory proof confirms it, and how you will debrief it. You should also be willing to discard a phrase that sounds good but does not improve driving. The goal is not to talk more. The goal is to use fewer, better words until they become part of your mental program.
Worked example: pre-grid nerves before the first session
You are buckled in, waiting to roll, and your mind is busier than the car. You are thinking about lap time, the instructor, traffic, whether the tires will come in, and the mistake you made last event. The wrong answer is to argue with every thought. That gives the nerves more attention. The better answer is to give your brain one useful job.
Use a short pre-session sequence. First, breathe deliberately enough that your body stops bracing. Second, run the opening section of the lap in mental imagery, including the first braking zone, the first turn-in, and the first exit. Third, choose one primary cue for the session. For an intermediate driver, that cue should usually be about sensory input or control economy, not lap time. The success criterion is not that you feel no nerves. The success criterion is that your mind has a clear driving task before the car moves.
This example is grounded in Bentley’s point that a mental technique before a race gives the brain something to do other than get nervous, and in his use of visualization to force focus before going onto the track. If the pre-grid cue works, your first lap should feel more organized. You should be able to describe what you felt and saw instead of only describing how nervous you were.
Worked example: Formula Ford passing rehearsal under pressure
Bentley’s Formula Ford story is the best racecraft example in the supplied corpus. He and a fellow competitor spent hours after races talking through passing moves, alternate situations, and what they could have done differently. They were not merely chatting. They were building mental repetitions. Later, in races, they made quick, aggressive, decisive passes because the situations had already been driven in their minds.
The self-talk lesson is this: the phrase you use in the car should unlock a rehearsed decision, not invent a decision at speed. If you have practiced an outside setup that becomes an exit pass, your cue in the moment might point to exit drive rather than panic at the block. If you have rehearsed what to do when a driver moves inside to defend, your cue can point to the early acceleration plan. The cue is short because the preparation was long.
For a club racer, the practical method is to pick one passing situation from the last event and rehearse three alternatives before the next one. In the car, use one cue that names the intended compromise. After the session, debrief whether the cue helped you choose quickly and assertively, or whether it collapsed into reaction.
Worked example: progressive hands in a production car
The bonded vehicle-dynamics chunk gives a useful car-specific situation. A production car with mass distributed farther from the center has a higher moment of inertia and takes longer to respond to initial turn-in than a more centralized open-wheel car. Bentley’s remedy is an earlier turn-in and a more progressive steering input. That is an ideal self-talk target because pressure often makes a driver do the opposite: wait, realize the car is not rotating, then add steering quickly.
The cue should point to the wanted behavior before the mistake. In this situation, the phrase might be a short reminder for progressive hands or early build. Use it before turn-in, not at the apex after the car is already wide. The sensory proof is that the front takes a set without a rushed steering spike, the car approaches the apex without overslowing, and your hands do not need a second large correction.
This example also shows why self-talk must be tied to real mechanism. The phrase is not a generic calming phrase. It is connected to how the car responds. Because the car takes longer to answer the first steering input, the cue changes timing and rate. If the phrase does not change those two things, it is not doing the job.
Common mistakes
The first mistake is negative cueing. You tell yourself not to miss the apex, not to overdrive, or not to blow the pass. That points the mind at the unwanted object. Good looks like naming the wanted action: breathe, look, feel, release, progressive hands, or drive the exit.
The second mistake is cue stacking. You try to run five mental instructions through one corner. That overloads attention and usually appears as late inputs. Good looks like one cue for one phase of one problem. Add more only after the first cue becomes natural.
The third mistake is using self-talk as in-car analysis. You miss a corner and spend the next straight explaining it to yourself. Good looks like returning to the next cue and saving the cause analysis for the debrief.
The fourth mistake is copying another driver’s phrase without testing it. Bentley emphasizes that mental programs are individual. Good looks like testing a phrase against your own sensory proof and keeping it only if it improves attention and driving.
The fifth mistake is making the cue about effort. Under pressure you tell yourself to push harder, be brave, or go faster. The bonded driving material points the other way: precision, gentle controls, less steering, relaxation, and better input quality. Good looks like a cue that makes the body quieter while the car remains fast.
The sixth mistake is never debriefing the cue. If you do not write down whether it worked, you are just collecting slogans. Good looks like a short note after the session: cue used, timing point, what changed, what to keep or change next time.
Drill: three-session attention steering loop
Run this drill across your next three on-track sessions. The count is three sessions, one primary cue per session, one target corner or phase at a time, and one written debrief after each session.
Before session one, choose a reset cue and a sensory cue. The reset cue is for nerves or post-error recovery. The sensory cue is for the driving problem you most want to improve. Do one mental lap before you go out. On track, use the sensory cue only at the chosen corner or phase. The success criterion for session one is that you remember to use the cue at least three times and can describe what sensory information changed.
Before session two, keep the cue only if it produced useful information. If it was too long, shorten it. If it pointed at the wrong behavior, rewrite it. Do another mental lap and use the cue in the same place. The success criterion for session two is cleaner timing: the cue arrives before the error, not after it.
Before session three, add pressure recovery. Any time you are surprised, delayed, passed, or disappointed by an error, use the reset cue first and then return to the primary cue at the next planned point. The success criterion is recoverability. You do not need a perfect session. You need proof that one event no longer steals the next several corners.
After all three sessions, keep only the phrases that improved attention, sensory input, or physical economy. Discard the rest. The drill is successful when you leave with a smaller and sharper cue set than you started with.
Calibration cues
A cue is working when it changes the next lap in observable ways. The felt signs are calmer breathing, more available vision, better grip feel, and less bracing. The control signs are quieter hands, more progressive steering, and fewer unnecessary corrections. The mental signs are shorter recovery after mistakes and less mid-corner narration.
Use debrief evidence. Ask what can be done to go faster, but ask it after the run. If you have video or data, look only for the behavior the cue was meant to affect. Do not turn the review into a new overload problem. If the cue was about smooth steering, review steering movement or visible hand activity. If the cue was about progressive turn-in for a production car, review the timing and rate of the initial input. If the cue was about pre-session focus, compare the first lap’s organization to your usual first lap.
The strongest calibration is repeatability under mild pressure. If the cue only works on a quiet lap but disappears in traffic, it is not fully programmed. If it still appears when another driver changes your plan or you make a small mistake, it is becoming part of your driving.
When this principle breaks down
Self-talk breaks down when the phrase is not connected to skill. A cue cannot replace learning the line, understanding the car, practicing smooth controls, or rehearsing decisions. It also breaks down when it becomes too broad. Phrases about being fast, being confident, or wanting the result are not precise enough unless they trigger a specific trained action.
It also breaks down when you change everything every session. Bentley’s mental-programming guidance is experimental, but it is not random. Choose the area where you have the most to gain, test the cue, make a note, and refine it. Do not take on every mental strategy at once.
Finally, self-talk breaks down when it becomes self-judgment in disguise. If the phrase carries frustration, shame, or threat, it will narrow attention rather than steer it. The fix is not to pretend the mistake did not happen. The fix is to convert the mistake into the next controllable cue, then analyze the cause after the session.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c21b9aec-19ec-713b-f58f-b40fe13cc069 | 376 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1230073c-a147-2110-c1b7-63251bf601e0 | 49 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 84688c44-9714-5f70-19a9-b7503c7b7482 | 186 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | faf47214-2619-0395-43b8-f1f6523e5a80 | 32 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 13d5ad27-440c-a690-f470-907b60dcfb22 | 476 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 7b584e87-cd53-ce7d-23d2-a2804465b5b5 | 324 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | a4147ea3-257f-67b9-5fef-f56d4cfb427f | 134 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 12b38229-583d-d709-b629-b88b24921c14 | 164 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | ee4ddb39-cb81-0fa5-5322-b5aefed1e642 | 276 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 39f4d330-7a81-6f93-d29d-1b33628d65ce | 148 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 47f6de8d-9d56-5b6d-547a-f1e7bb92faaf | 152 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 14 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 7f32498f-d9fd-bd02-17d6-a1aa8be21a50 | 501 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 15 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 4400491c-451f-86fc-590c-1fa83983aef9 | 12 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 16 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c179b4ca-b1cd-bbae-16ca-d15b1ecdfc12 | 11 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 17 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | f74de7b7-deb7-8b53-8851-548f3670c623 | 178 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |