Coach from the right seat with better questions
Generated from
content/lms/instructor-coaching-mentorship/02-coaching-and-pedagogy/01-coaching.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/instructor-coaching-mentorship/02-coaching-and-pedagogy/01-coaching.md
Course: Instructor and Coaching Mentorship
Module: Coaching and Pedagogy
Estimated duration: 55 minutes
Skill goal
Your job in the right seat is not to prove how much you know. Your job is to help the driver build the next useful piece of skill, awareness, confidence, and judgment. Sometimes that means teaching. Sometimes it means giving a direct instruction. Often, especially with an intermediate driver, it means asking a better question.
A good coaching question changes the driver's attention. It points their mind at the part of the drive that matters right now: vision, brake release, the car's balance, confidence, rhythm, or the gap between what they intended and what actually happened. The question is not a trick and it is not a softer way of giving the same lecture. It is a tool for drawing out what the driver already knows, what they felt but have not named yet, or what they can discover on the next lap.
That distinction matters because performance driving is mostly a mental task expressed through physical controls. The driver's hands, feet, and eyes do not act independently. They act because the driver's brain has selected a target, a timing, and a control input. If you want the student to drive differently, you must change what the student is aware of and what the student is trying to do. Questions are one of the cleanest ways to do that.
This lesson is about how to use questions from the right seat without becoming vague, passive, or unsafe. You will learn when a question is the right tool, when it is the wrong tool, how to build a question before the session begins, how to ask at speed without overloading the driver, how to use teach-back after the session, and how to tell whether your questions are actually improving the driver.
The governing distinction: teaching, instructing, coaching
Teaching pushes information into the student. Instructing includes teaching, but it also includes demonstration, correction, and physical skill building. Coaching draws out awareness, understanding, or a skill the student already has access to. In the right seat, you should be able to move among all three modes, not because one is morally better, but because different moments need different tools.
If the driver is a true novice and does not yet know the line, the flags, the corner stations, the braking markers, or the meaning of track-out, there is not much to draw out. You need to teach and instruct. If the driver is intermediate and can already circulate safely, your leverage changes. The driver may know what a late apex is. The driver may know that vision matters. The missing piece may be awareness under load. That is where coaching questions become powerful.
With an intermediate driver, a direct statement such as release the brake more gently may be correct, but it can also leave the student dependent on you. A question such as how gently are you releasing the brake pedal asks the driver to notice the pressure change, the car's response, and the mismatch between intention and execution. The driver is no longer just obeying. The driver is learning to monitor.
That is the right-seat coaching target: the driver starts to hear their own useful question before you ask it. At first, you ask. Then the student answers. Then the student begins to notice the answer before you speak. Eventually the student becomes the source of the question. That is the bridge from in-car instruction to self-coaching.
But coaching is not abdication. You still own the safety environment from the right seat. If the driver is headed toward a late brake with no margin, you do not ask a philosophical question about intentions. You give the short, clear, current instruction the moment requires. If the driver's confidence is ahead of skill, you do not wait to see whether it works out. You intervene before the mistake becomes an incident. Questions serve the learning process; they do not replace judgment.
The principle: a question should move attention to one observable thing
A weak question makes the driver think about everything. A strong question narrows attention to one useful thing. The question should tell the driver where to aim their awareness without telling them the whole answer.
Where are your eyes right now? is useful because vision is observable. Can you see the track-out yet? is useful because it directs the driver's eyes to a target. What did the car do as you started releasing the brake? is useful because it connects pedal timing to car balance. What did you do well that lap? is useful because it trains the student to notice success, not only error. What is the one thing you want to improve this session? is useful because it gives the student ownership before the engine starts.
A vague question such as how was that? is usually weak at speed because it asks the student to review the whole lap while still driving. A broad question can work in the paddock, but on track the driver needs one object of attention. Ask one thing, then be quiet enough for the driver to drive.
The mechanism is simple. Quality driving depends on quality sensory input: what the driver sees, feels, and hears. If the student is not gathering good sensory information, more verbal information from you will not automatically fix the drive. The student has to notice the car, the road, the timing, and their own inputs. A good question upgrades the student's input stream. Better input allows better decisions. Better decisions allow better actions. Better actions create better practice.
This is why practice quality matters. Repetition by itself can program the wrong thing. If a driver repeats a late look-in, a rushed brake release, or an anxious early throttle, they are not just making a mistake. They are practicing the mistake. Questions interrupt that autopilot by making the driver conscious of the thing being programmed. Perfect practice is not only cleaner execution; it is practice with awareness of the correct target.
The three-part question loop
Use the same coaching loop every session: ask before, ask during, ask after.
Before the session, ask for ownership. The first question is not about your favorite topic. Ask the student what they want to work on or improve. Sometimes they will know. Sometimes they will say something too broad, such as being faster. Sometimes they will not know at all. Your job is to turn the answer into one useful objective. If the driver says they want to brake later, you may need to define later in car lengths or marker references. If the driver says they want to be smoother, you may need to choose one control input, such as brake release or steering unwind. If they just came from classroom, ask what was covered and whether they have questions. That connects the classroom to the car and shows the student that the program is integrated.
During the session, ask for awareness. The in-motion question must be short, timed, and current. Do not run a debrief while the driver is approaching a braking zone. Do not ask a multi-part question at the moment the student needs eyes up and hands calm. Ask just early enough that the answer improves the next action. For vision, ask before turn-in. For brake release, ask just before or during the release. For balance, ask after the car has taken a set. For confidence, ask only when there is enough straight or calm track to process the answer.
After the session, ask for reflection and teach-back. Ask what the student did well and what they could improve. Then ask the student to explain the skill back to you. A student who can describe where they looked, when they braked, where they released, what the apex was, where the exit was, and what the car felt like is learning at a deeper level than a student who only nods while you talk. Teach-back also exposes false understanding. You may think the student understood trail braking, heel-and-toe, vision, or line priority. When they try to explain it, you may discover the missing piece.
The question ladder
Use a ladder rather than random questions. The ladder keeps the session from becoming a quiz show.
Level 1 is ownership. What do you want to work on this session? What did the classroom cover that you want to connect to the car? What was the one thing from the last run you want to carry forward? These questions happen while stopped. They help you choose the focus and help the student commit to it.
Level 2 is attention. Where are you looking now? Can you see the exit? What part of the braking zone are you using as your reference? These questions happen at speed, but only when the answer can guide the current corner or the next repetition.
Level 3 is sensation. What did the car do as you released the brake? Did the car feel settled before you turned? Did you feel the steering go light, heavy, or neutral? These questions train sensory input. They are useful because many intermediate drivers can describe the theory of a corner but cannot yet describe what the car told them.
Level 4 is comparison. Was that release slower or faster than the last lap? Did the car rotate earlier or later? Was your vision ahead of the car or catching up to it? These questions help the student build a before-and-after model. They also prevent the common problem of making a change without knowing whether anything actually changed.
Level 5 is teach-back. Talk me around the next lap. Tell me where you are looking. Tell me when you start braking. Tell me when you start releasing. Tell me what the car is doing. This is not for the whole session and not for every driver. It is a deliberate exercise. Pick one or two elements so the driver can still drive.
Level 6 is self-coaching. What question should you ask yourself before this corner? What did you notice before I said anything? What will you look for next lap? This is the level where the driver begins to carry the coaching process alone.
Use the lowest level that solves the problem. If the student has no ownership, start there. If the student has ownership but poor awareness, ask attention and sensation questions. If the student can feel the car but cannot interpret it, ask comparison questions. If the student can explain and monitor, move toward self-coaching.
How to ask at speed
At speed, your voice is part of the control environment. Your timing, volume, tone, rhythm, and word order matter. The driver is operating under load, often in a place where stress narrows attention. A calm, rhythmic, low-demand question can make the drive more organized. A late, sharp, wordy question can break the driver's rhythm even if the words are technically correct.
The first rule is to ask before the driver needs the answer. If you want the driver to see the track-out, ask early enough that the eyes can move before turn-in. If you want the driver to notice brake release, ask as the release begins, not two corners later. If you want the driver to compare rotation, ask after the car has responded, preferably on a straight or a lower-workload section.
The second rule is to use fewer words than you think you need. An intermediate driver can process a short prompt while driving. They may not process a paragraph. If you need to explain the reason behind the question, save it for the pits or paddock. At speed, ask the question, let the driver answer with a word or a nod if needed, and then let the next repetition teach.
The third rule is to keep the question positive and directional. Focus on what the driver should attend to, not on what they should fear. Do not ask, are you going to miss the apex again? Ask, where is your apex reference now? Do not ask, why are you rushing? Ask, what is the pace of your brake release? The question should pull awareness forward into the desired action.
The fourth rule is to stop asking when the student is saturated. If the answers get delayed, vague, irritated, or wrong because the driver is overloaded, reduce the task. Return to one reference point, one corner, or one control. Coaching through questions depends on awareness. When the mind is flooded, the question is not creating awareness; it is adding load.
Specificity: questions still need edges
Questions are not a license to be vague. If the driver says they want to brake later, you need to help define what later means. Later by one car length and later by ten car lengths are different tasks. Braking at the 3 marker instead of the 4 marker is different from braking harder at the same marker. Finishing the braking at the same place is different from carrying the brake release deeper into the corner. A question can open the conversation, but the objective still needs a concrete reference.
The pattern is: ask, define, rehearse, execute, review.
Ask what the driver wants to improve. Define it in track language. Rehearse it mentally while stopped. Execute it with one or two at-speed prompts. Review whether the car and driver response matched the plan. If the objective is braking three car lengths later, ask whether the student can picture that distance before the car moves. If the objective is looking to track-out earlier, ask what visual cue will trigger the eyes. If the objective is gentler brake release, ask what the student expects the front of the car to feel like when they release with control.
This is where the instructor's expertise still matters. The student owns the learning process, but you help turn vague desire into a measurable practice target. That is the difference between coaching and chatting.
Confidence management: questions are not enough when risk is rising
Coaching questions work well when the driver has enough margin to learn. They do not replace direct control of an unsafe trend. If a student's confidence is higher than skill, deal with it early. Do not wait for proof in the form of a crash, spin, or near miss. The right response may be a polite but direct discussion in the pits or paddock. It may be a deliberate lower-speed task that redirects attention away from raw pace. It may be ending the session.
Questions can help diagnose confidence. What are you using to decide that speed is okay? What did the car tell you at turn-in? What is your margin if the car does not slow the way you expect? These questions can expose whether the student has awareness or only optimism. But if the student continues to drive beyond skill, the mode changes. You stop coaching and instruct directly.
Be careful with demonstration rides as a confidence correction. Showing a student how fast you can drive can backfire if they only register the speed and not the skill gap. Many students do not yet have the awareness to see what you are doing differently. A better coaching move is often to slow the task down, make the difficult skill visible, and ask the student to work deliberately where there is margin.
The right-seat question set
Use a small set of dependable questions, not a new improvisation every lap. The best questions are plain enough to use under pressure.
Pre-session ownership questions: What do you want to work on this session? What did the classroom just cover? What question do you still have from the last session? What is the one behavior you want to repeat from your best lap? What is the one behavior you want to change?
Vision questions: Where are your eyes now? Can you see the track-out? What is the next reference your eyes need? Are your eyes ahead of the car or catching up? What did you see earlier that lap than the lap before?
Brake questions: Where did braking begin? How quickly did pressure build? How gently did you release? What did the car do as pressure came off? Did the car feel stable before turn-in?
Balance questions: What is the car doing in the middle of the corner? Does it want more steering, less steering, or patience? Did it turn when you asked? Did it feel settled, skatey, soft, or responsive? What changed when you changed your release or speed?
Ownership and reflection questions: What did you do well? What would you improve? What was different on the better lap? What question should you ask yourself before that corner next session? Can you teach that technique back to me?
Do not use all of these in one session. Choose the few that match the session objective. A strong coaching session often uses one pre-session ownership question, one or two at-speed awareness questions, and one post-session teach-back question. The student should leave with clarity, not a transcript.
Worked example: intermediate vision session
You are assigned an intermediate driver who is safe, smooth enough, and frustrated that lap time has stopped improving. You ask before leaving pit lane what they want to work on. They say they need to be faster everywhere. That answer is too broad, so you narrow it. You ask what they noticed in the last session. They admit that corner exits felt rushed and they were finding track-out late. Now the objective is not generic speed. It is earlier vision to exit.
In the paddock, you connect the objective to any classroom material. If the classroom just covered vision, you ask what part made sense and what part did not. Then you define the task: on three selected corners, the driver will identify track-out before turning in. You are not going to coach every corner. You are going to coach the visual habit.
On track, your first prompt comes early on the straight before the first selected corner: can you see track-out? The driver answers yes or no. If no, you ask for the next visual reference, then let the corner happen. You do not lecture through turn-in. On the next repetition, you ask earlier. If the driver now sees the exit before turn-in, you ask after the corner what changed. If the driver says the car felt calmer, you have linked awareness to outcome. If the driver says nothing changed, you stay with the question and let the repetitions build.
After the session, you ask the driver to talk you through the three selected corners. Where were the eyes before braking? When was track-out visible? Which corner improved first? What did the car feel like when the eyes were ahead? Then you ask what they did well and what they will improve. The goal is not that the driver compliments themselves. The goal is that the driver can identify the behavior that created the better exit.
That is coaching. You did not simply tell the driver to look up. You built a loop: ownership, visual question, sensory result, teach-back.
Worked example: the brake-later request
An intermediate driver says before the session that they want to brake later. This is a common moment where an instructor can either be useful or dangerous. If you only say to brake later, the driver may interpret that as a dare. Later could mean one car length, ten car lengths, harder pressure, a different release point, or carrying too much speed into the corner.
You start with questions while stopped. How much later are you picturing? What marker are you using now? Where do you want the car to be fully slowed? What will tell you the car still has margin? If the driver cannot answer, you do not have a coaching target yet. You have a wish.
You define a conservative experiment. The driver will move the brake start by a small, visible distance on one corner only. The driver will keep the release target and turn-in discipline under control. You ask whether the driver can picture the distance. You ask where the eyes will be as braking begins. You explain that entering a little faster is only acceptable if the car is still settled and the driver can release with control.
At speed, your prompts are short. On the approach, you ask for the marker. During release, you ask how the release feels. After the corner, on a straight, you ask what changed. If the driver says the car was fine and can describe the sensation, you may repeat. If the driver says it felt rushed or cannot describe what happened, you return to the previous marker or shift the task to smoother release. The question protects the experiment from becoming an ego contest.
After the session, you ask the student to explain what braking later actually changed. Did the speed at turn-in change? Did release timing change? Did the car rotate better or worse? Did exit improve, or did the later brake only make entry exciting? If the student cannot connect the change to the car's response, the skill is not yet learned.
Worked example: overconfidence in a fast student
A different intermediate driver is quick and proud of it. Their speed is rising faster than their awareness. You feel the car arriving at braking zones with shrinking margin. You ask what they are using as references, and the answers are vague. You ask what the car did under braking, and the driver says it felt fine, but the answer does not match what you felt from the right seat.
This is not the moment to keep asking questions indefinitely. You bring the car in or create a direct reset at the next safe opportunity. In the pits, you have a polite, honest, direct conversation. The point is not to shame the driver. The point is to align confidence with skill before the session turns expensive or dangerous.
Then you redirect the task away from speed. You might choose a lower-speed corner and make brake release or vision the objective. The question becomes deliberate: what did the car do as you released? Where were your eyes before turn-in? What reference tells you the car is ready? The student now has a difficult skill to practice at a lower pace. That is better than letting confidence chase speed without awareness.
The teach-back close
A session is not complete because the checker flew or the car entered the paddock. It is complete when the student can identify the lesson. Ask what went well. Ask what can improve. Then ask the student to teach the skill back to you.
This does several things. It proves whether the student understood. It deepens the student's learning because explaining a skill forces organization. It exposes your own assumptions. It also gives you the next session's starting point. If the student can clearly explain the vision task, you may move to brake release next time. If the student cannot explain it, the next session should not add complexity.
Keep a small note after each session. Write the objective, the useful question, the student's best answer, and the next step. This is especially important when you are assigned multiple students. It also shows the student that you are committed to their progress, not simply riding along until the session ends.
Common mistakes
The first mistake is using questions to avoid taking responsibility. A question is not a substitute for a safety call. If the student is about to make a high-risk error, be direct.
The second mistake is asking questions that are too broad for the workload. How was that lap? can be useful in the paddock. It is usually too large in the middle of a session. Ask about one corner, one input, or one sensation.
The third mistake is asking but not listening. If you ask what the student wants to work on and then run your normal script anyway, you have taught the student that ownership is fake. Use the answer or explain why you need to redirect.
The fourth mistake is coaching too early in the learning curve. A novice may need clear teaching first. Questions work best when the student has enough knowledge or experience to draw from.
The fifth mistake is letting ego drive the session, yours or theirs. If you talk to sound expert, you reduce learning. If the student chases speed to feel expert, you must slow the task down. The most effective instructor keeps learning and keeps the student central.
The sixth mistake is failing to integrate the classroom. If the student just learned a concept in class and you ignore it in the car, you make the program feel fragmented. Ask what was covered and connect the on-track work to it.
The seventh mistake is giving a vague performance target. Telling a driver to brake later, be smoother, or look ahead is not enough. Turn the target into a specific behavior and a question that checks it.
Drill: the three-session coaching ladder
Use this drill at your next event with one intermediate student. It takes three on-track sessions and two short paddock debriefs. The success criterion is not lap time. The success criterion is that the student can name the objective, answer the at-speed awareness question with useful specificity, and teach the skill back after the session.
Session 1 is ownership and attention. Before the session, ask what the student wants to improve. Narrow the answer to one behavior on two or three corners. During the run, ask only one repeated awareness question tied to that behavior. After the run, ask what changed and write one note.
Session 2 is sensation and comparison. Keep the same behavior unless the first session proved it was the wrong target. Ask what the student feels when the behavior changes. Then ask for comparisons between laps: earlier or later, calmer or busier, settled or unsettled. After the run, ask the student to describe the best repetition.
Session 3 is teach-back and self-coaching. Before the run, ask the student to state the question they will ask themselves. During the run, reduce your prompts. Ask the student to talk you around one selected section if workload allows. After the run, ask the student to teach the skill to you as if you were the beginner.
If the student can do that, you have not just helped them through a session. You have installed a practice strategy.
Calibration: how you know the questions are working
The student's answers become more concrete. Early answers may sound like good or bad, fast or slow, fine or scary. Better answers include where the eyes were, when the brake came off, what the car did, which lap changed, and what the driver will try next.
The student's corrections move earlier. At first, you ask after the mistake. Then you ask before the corner. Later the student notices before you speak. That is one of the strongest signs of progress.
The student's confidence and skill move closer together. A low-confidence driver begins to trust a specific behavior because they can feel why it works. An overconfident driver begins to respect the gap between speed and awareness because the questions expose what they do not yet know.
Your own talking decreases without the quality of driving decreasing. That is not silence for its own sake. It is evidence that the driver is carrying more of the coaching process internally.
The debrief gets shorter and sharper. Instead of replaying the whole session, you can ask what the objective was, what changed, and what the next step is. If the student can answer those three, the session produced learning.
Where this connects
This lesson is narrower than the sibling lesson on teaching the driver in front of you. That lesson is about adapting to the human being in the car. This one is about one specific tool: the coaching question. The two belong together. You choose the question based on the driver in front of you, and you judge the answer by that driver's awareness, confidence, and skill.
It also connects to mental training. Good drivers ask themselves awareness-building questions. Good instructors teach that habit by modeling it from the right seat. When your questions are clear, specific, and timed well, the student learns more than the answer. They learn how to practice.
The final standard
A good right-seat coaching question does four things. It points attention at one observable thing. It arrives at a moment when the driver can use it. It gives the student ownership rather than ego pressure. It produces an answer that shapes the next repetition.
If your question does not do those things, improve it or switch modes. Teach when the student lacks information. Instruct when the student needs a direct correction. Coach when awareness is the missing link. The best instructors are not the ones who talk the most. They are the ones who help the driver notice the right thing soon enough to do something better with it.
Worked example: intermediate vision coaching
An intermediate driver says they want to be faster everywhere. You narrow the objective before the car moves by asking what they noticed last session. When they admit that exits felt rushed and track-out appeared late, you turn the session into a vision exercise. On track, you ask one timed question before selected corners: can the driver see the track-out before turn-in? After each repetition, you ask what changed in the car when the eyes were earlier. In the debrief, you ask the driver to talk through the selected corners and identify what they did well. The point is not to tell the driver to look up. The point is to build ownership, visual awareness, sensory result, and teach-back into one loop.
Worked example: the brake-later request
A driver who asks to brake later has not yet defined a skill. They may mean a small shift in brake start, a different marker, harder pressure, or a later release. While stopped, ask what marker they use now, how much later they are picturing, where they expect to finish braking, and what will tell them the car still has margin. Then choose one conservative experiment on one corner. At speed, keep the prompts short: marker, release feel, car response. If the student can describe the difference and the car remains settled, repeat. If the student only feels rushed, return to the previous reference and coach release quality instead.
Worked example: overconfidence in a fast student
When a quick intermediate driver's confidence rises faster than awareness, questions can diagnose the gap but should not delay intervention. Ask what references they are using and what the car is doing under braking. If the answers are vague while speed and risk are increasing, bring the car in or reset the session directly at the next safe opportunity. In the pits, have the polite, direct conversation. Then redirect the driver away from pace and toward a difficult lower-speed task such as brake release or vision. The coaching question becomes a way to rebuild awareness with margin, not a way to negotiate with risk.
Common mistakes
The common errors are predictable. Some instructors ask questions to avoid making safety calls; good coaching still switches to direct instruction when risk requires it. Some ask broad questions at high workload; good coaching asks about one observable thing at the right time. Some ask what the student wants and then ignore the answer; good coaching uses the answer or redirects it clearly. Some try to coach a novice who needs teaching first; good coaching chooses the mode that fits the student's knowledge. Some let ego drive the session; good coaching keeps the student central and keeps the instructor learning. Some fail to connect classroom material to the car; good coaching asks what was covered and builds the session around it when appropriate.
Drill: the three-session coaching ladder
Use one intermediate student across three sessions. In Session 1, ask for the student's objective, narrow it to one behavior on two or three corners, and use one repeated awareness question at speed. In Session 2, keep the same behavior and add sensation and comparison questions, asking what changed and whether the car felt earlier, later, calmer, or busier. In Session 3, ask the student to state the self-coaching question before leaving the paddock, reduce your prompts, and use a short teach-back after the run. The drill succeeds when the student can state the objective, answer with specific sensory language, and explain the skill back to you.
Calibration cues
The questions are working when the student's answers become more specific, corrections happen earlier, confidence and skill move closer together, and the debrief becomes shorter but sharper. Early answers may be vague, but improving answers include where the eyes were, when braking began, what the car did during release, which repetition was better, and what the driver will try next. The strongest cue is that the student begins to ask the useful question before you do.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | d3fbe60a-1f7f-82b9-c5bf-f301e1fe17a3 | 17 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | 2fab683b-8d72-de17-cabd-6b1d1965bd68 | 37 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | 260fbb08-3f24-bf87-c2cc-78615954001b | 30 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | 02af3cd4-493c-24c9-e8f7-23da140b356d | 16 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | 387bb0de-7678-f5d7-f568-e8a2beee62bf | 12 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | bf5cb3ec-324a-b297-8801-c9c7b7045c1f | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | 3c810b44-3035-c309-cd06-a3b602911c64 | 13 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | d228ad67-02d0-59cc-e79a-36eaa2832e98 | 31 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | faf47214-2619-0395-43b8-f1f6523e5a80 | 32 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 8c502c63-38f5-17ca-6f0a-e0819f0d4062 | 134 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Ross Bentley The Instructor-Manifesto | a9d3ef19-b90f-3858-0eb3-5135e022e530 | 6 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 14 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 4400491c-451f-86fc-590c-1fa83983aef9 | 12 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |